arvato
56 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Baden-Baden 1
20.03.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 2
08.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Dorsten 3
23.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Dortmund 4
05.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Dortmund 5
13.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Dortmund 6
07.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Dortmund 7
07.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Dortmund 8
05.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Dortmund 9
24.06.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Dortmund 10
23.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Dortmund 11
19.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Dortmund 12
02.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Dortmund 13
15.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Düren 14
27.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Eiweiler 15
28.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Eiweiler 16
27.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Ennigerloh 17
28.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Essen 18
14.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Essen 19
13.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Gütersloh 20
21.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Gütersloh 21
23.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Gütersloh 22
30.07.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Gütersloh 23
23.09.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Gütersloh 24
20.02.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Gütersloh 25
27.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Gütersloh 26
19.09.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Gütersloh 27
11.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Employers with criticisms.
Gütersloh 28
15.09.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Hamburg 29
12.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hannover 30
11.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Harselwinkel 31
16.05.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Heusweiler-Eiweiler 32
07.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Heusweiler-Eiweiler 33
05.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Heusweiler-Eiweiler 34
02.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Heusweiler-Eiweiler 35
11.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 36
15.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 37
16.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 38
05.07.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 39
20.10.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 40
05.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 41
07.06.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 42
10.06.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 43
21.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 44
23.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 45
05.01.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 46
10.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 47
19.10.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 48
19.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 49
09.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 50
01.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 51
05.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 52
25.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 53
27.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Potsdam 54
03.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 55
12.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Rostock 56
17.03.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
